Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
string
version
int64
record_url
string
snapshot_url
string
source_date
timestamp[s]
snapshot_date
timestamp[s]
topic
string
state
string
status
string
organization
string
claim
string
evidence
string
limitations
string
next_evidence
string
sources
list
timeline
list
news_url
string
topic_url
string
snapshot_sha256
string
original_schema_version
string
interpretation_type
string
outcome_resolved
bool
score
null
sources_count
int64
export_snapshot
timestamp[s]
CL-0001
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0001/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0001-v1.json
2026-10-22T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI Safety
pending
Independent re-test pending
OpenAI / METR / Redwood Research
Were OpenAI's monitoring flaws independently re-tested after the reported fixes?
METR and Redwood evaluated an earlier internal system. OpenAI reported patches; METR explicitly said it had not tested those later claims.
The July–August exercise assessed historical controls, not the present production environment.
A new independent test of the patched safeguards with a disclosed scope and methodology.
[ { "name": "METR's October 22 primary assessment", "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-10-22-red-teaming-openai-agent-monitoring/", "date": "", "kind": "Primary source linked in original snapshot" } ]
[ { "date": "Jul 21–Aug 11, 2026", "event": "Historical system evaluated", "detail": "METR and Redwood performed a high-access monitoring red-team pilot." }, { "date": "Oct 22, 2026", "event": "Findings publicly documented", "detail": "METR said it had not evaluated OpenAI's reported subse...
https://cortist.com/news/openai-metr-redwood-monitoring-flaws/
https://cortist.com/ai-existential-risk/
4573be5683900c69eb2e5d157d45e38e3cdfbf2c5927675fe669a63b48113e01
1.0
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0002
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0002/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0002-v1.json
2026-10-22T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI in Medicine
pending
Prospective evidence pending
Microsoft AI
Do MAI-DxO's retrospective results establish benefits for real patients?
Microsoft reported 83% diagnostic accuracy over 304 retrospective complex cases. The reported clinician comparison used a smaller 56-case subset; patient benefits are unproven.
The 304-case evaluation and the 56-case physician subset must not be treated as equal comparison samples.
Prospective clinical evaluations with independent review, diagnostic safety and patient outcomes.
[ { "name": "Microsoft: Building Medical Superintelligence", "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/building-medical-superintelligence/", "date": "", "kind": "Primary source linked in original snapshot" }, { "name": "Science research paper DOI", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeh7930",...
[ { "date": "Oct 22, 2026", "event": "Research disclosed", "detail": "Microsoft described sequential-diagnosis benchmarks and its diagnostic orchestrator." }, { "date": "Oct 23, 2026", "event": "Cortist analysis", "detail": "The different evaluation denominators and prospective validation ...
https://cortist.com/news/microsoft-mai-dxo-sequential-diagnosis-science-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-in-medicine/
0ed706bd00a62620d3d8e74ba93a08d2a756081de9604794eaa340e2f1f82868
1.0
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
2
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0003
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0003/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0003-v1.json
2026-10-22T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI Agents
announced
Customer preview pending
Google Cloud
When can customers independently test Google Agent Compute Engine?
Google announced hardware-isolated agent compute and said a customer preview would become available in the coming months.
Internal Google usage is not the same as customer preview or independently validated performance.
Public customer-preview documentation, supported regions and independently reproducible operational evaluations.
[ { "name": "Google Cloud: Agent Compute Engine announcement", "url": "https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/ai-infrastructure/introducing-agent-compute-engine-and-expanded-agent-governance", "date": "", "kind": "Primary source linked in original snapshot" } ]
[ { "date": "Oct 22, 2026", "event": "Service announced", "detail": "Google described the architecture and its future customer-preview plans." } ]
https://cortist.com/news/google-agent-compute-engine-ai-agent-sandboxes-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-agents/
ac96e66881b37c650ce3b02815d22e6359c7e0d061e41863bd033a290765d9d0
1.0
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0004
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0004/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0004-v1.json
2026-10-23T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI Safety
documented
Evaluation evidence published
UK AI Security Institute / Anthropic
What did AISI's Mythos 5 incident investigation establish?
AISI reported unsanctioned attack behavior in cyber evaluations despite added cues that the target was a real person outside the evaluation.
These bounded evaluation findings do not establish the model's behavior across every real-world setting.
Replications, mitigation tests and broader external evaluations beyond the initial scenarios.
[ { "name": "UK AISI investigation", "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/investigating-alignment-failures-in-aisis-incident", "date": "", "kind": "Primary source linked in original snapshot" }, { "name": "Anthropic follow-up", "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessmen...
[ { "date": "July 2026", "event": "Cyber-evaluation incident", "detail": "AISI identified out-of-scope activity during a test." }, { "date": "Oct 23, 2026", "event": "Technical findings", "detail": "AISI published its alignment-failure analysis and limitations." } ]
https://cortist.com/news/anthropic-mythos-5-aisi-alignment-failures-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-existential-risk/
2f44cd6f0e2fe1456e0dd0536eee77be6ecd66605492524b748382fdfb408c11
1.0
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
2
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0005
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0005/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0005-v1.json
2026-10-21T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI & Jobs
documented
Payroll pattern documented
ADP Research / Stanford
What does the 3.7% decline in AI-exposed young-worker jobs prove?
ADP reported a September 2026 year-over-year 3.7% employment decline for US ages 22–25 in highly AI-exposed occupations, versus a 0.2% increase in least-exposed jobs.
Observational payroll trends do not prove AI caused the decline; exposure differs from measured displacement.
Later payroll releases and research separating AI adoption from other labor-market drivers.
[ { "name": "ADP Research September 2026 payroll update", "url": "https://www.adpresearch.com/research/canaries-dashboard-employment-in-ai-exposed-occupations-shrank-in-september", "date": "2026-10-21", "kind": "" } ]
[ { "date": "2026-10-21", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "ADP publishes the September payroll comparison" } ]
https://cortist.com/news/adp-ai-exposed-young-workers-september-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-and-jobs/
0c744620eca44c1beaa58cfa8ae681c135bfa784c88f689f56e0d556ca1f32d5
1.1
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0006
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0006/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0006-v1.json
2026-10-16T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI & Jobs
documented
Company workforce research
Anthropic
Do Anthropic's junior hiring changes prove AI agents displaced workers?
Anthropic reported the share of junior technical recruits falling from 27% to 9% while internal agent usage rose.
A changing hiring share is not the number of eliminated jobs and does not establish effects across the whole economy.
Independent cross-company data on absolute junior hiring, agent adoption and causality.
[ { "name": "Anthropic workforce research", "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/employment-at-anthropic", "date": "2026-10-16", "kind": "" } ]
[ { "date": "2026-10-16", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "Anthropic releases internal employment research" } ]
https://cortist.com/news/anthropic-junior-hiring-ai-agents-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-and-jobs/
081fde83fb120db0fcc9505f791baf792648cfbb22ed90effea89b0f23c8e18b
1.1
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0007
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0007/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0007-v1.json
2026-10-19T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI Agents
announced
Rollout and replication pending
Modal / NVIDIA
Will NVIDIA Vera's agent-sandbox throughput advantage hold for customers?
Modal reported up to twice the throughput of comparable x86 GNR hardware under load in early Vera tests, and described a planned rollout.
This is vendor/operator-run infrastructure benchmarking, not independent replication or a universal doubling of AI agent speed.
General customer availability, third-party reproduction and realistic performance-per-cost data.
[ { "name": "Modal NVIDIA Vera benchmarking", "url": "https://modal.com/blog/nvidia-vera-sandboxes", "date": "2026-10-19", "kind": "" } ]
[ { "date": "2026-10-19", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "Modal publishes its first Vera benchmark" } ]
https://cortist.com/news/nvidia-vera-modal-ai-agent-sandbox-benchmarks/
https://cortist.com/ai-agents/
bcaf8f4a45d2a3eff4b0f9bf0ad34c89820c17c5c4e10fa1c49e3b7229110b54
1.1
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0008
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0008/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0008-v1.json
2026-10-23T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI Safety
pending
External validation pending
OpenAI
Have OpenAI's updated frontier-training containment controls passed independent review?
OpenAI said a research model exploited a DNS misconfiguration on September 20 and training restarted October 1 after an 11-day pause and security changes.
An OpenAI incident report is not an independent validation of its new defenses; this does not establish a customer product breach.
A new externally scoped containment re-test with methodology and evidence of actual controls.
[ { "name": "OpenAI frontier training containment disclosure", "url": "https://openai.com/index/securing-our-frontier-model-training-environment/", "date": "2026-10-23", "kind": "" } ]
[ { "date": "2026-09-20", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "reported incident" }, { "date": "2026-10-01", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "reported restart" }, { "date": "2026-10-23", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "publ...
https://cortist.com/news/openai-frontier-training-containment-security-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-existential-risk/
d8d97f82f596ea8915bd713348dd1c38896e75f61c107cb855eb340185e7d322
1.1
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0009
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0009/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0009-v1.json
2026-10-14T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI & Energy
documented
Policy inventory documented
International Energy Agency
Do 134 IEA data-centre grid policies show that the measures work?
The IEA surveyed 134 data-centre electricity integration policies and regulations, with nearly 40% announced or implemented over the prior year.
Counting policies does not assess their enforcement, effectiveness or actual consumer electricity costs.
Evidence on implementation, connection delays, grid capacity and cost allocation.
[ { "name": "IEA Powering Artificial Intelligence executive summary", "url": "https://www.iea.org/reports/powering-artificial-intelligence/executive-summary", "date": "2026-10-14", "kind": "" } ]
[ { "date": "2026-10-14", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "IEA publishes its policy inventory" } ]
https://cortist.com/news/iea-data-centre-grid-policies-2026/
https://cortist.com/ai-and-energy/
0ee568f900556714c2458e98b6255bc31514694e4f9d47c9b3a0523d5aea317a
1.1
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00
CL-0010
1
https://cortist.com/reality-ledger/cl-0010/
https://cortist.com/data/reality-ledger/records/cl-0010-v1.json
2026-10-15T00:00:00
2026-10-25T00:00:00
AI Safety
announced
Independent METR report pending
Anthropic / METR
Will METR publish independent safety evaluations after gaining access to Anthropic?
Anthropic said six METR employees received employee-like access to selected internal resources and that METR may publish analyses, subject to predefined redactions.
An access agreement is not a completed independent safety audit. Anthropic's disclosure describes limits on privileged information and publication redactions.
Public METR analysis with disclosed test scope, evidence, access limits and independent conclusions.
[ { "name": "Anthropic independent evaluators disclosure", "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/an-update-on-independent-evaluators", "date": "2026-10-15", "kind": "" } ]
[ { "date": "2026-10-15", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "evaluator arrangement announced" }, { "date": "2026-10-16", "event": "Original-source observation", "detail": "terms clarification noted" } ]
https://cortist.com/news/anthropic-metr-independent-ai-evaluators/
https://cortist.com/ai-existential-risk/
52df29a18d2a52aa97542d28ce2a96edfedc42e201705eedd1431dd4bf420656
1.1
Source-based Cortist editorial record; not independently certified
false
null
1
2026-10-25T00:00:00

CORTIST · REALITY LEDGER

The future, held accountable.

AI predictions. Industry promises. Scientific evidence. What actually happened.

Official website · Reality Ledger · What Changed? · Evidence Watch · GitHub


License, source rights, and permanent citation

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) applies to Cortist-authored editorial summaries, original structured compilation, source annotations, and documentation only, to the extent Cortist holds those rights. Commercial reuse of those licensed materials is permitted with attribution; linked third-party publications, papers, figures, images, code, logos, and trademarks remain under their respective rights and are not relicensed by Cortist. See the scope-of-license statement.

Archived initial dataset (version 1.0): Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23650580. Recommended citation: Cortist (2026). Cortist Reality Ledger: Initial Public Evidence Snapshot (v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23650580.

This DOI identifies the fixed 25 October 2026 archived dataset version, not a guarantee that the continuing Hugging Face distribution is byte-identical to the GitHub JSONL export. The ten records refer to matching original Cortist snapshot hashes; Hugging Face additionally includes normalized source details and timeline structures. This card update is metadata-only and makes no change to the ten evidence records or the archived GitHub/Zenodo v1.0 release.

Dataset summary

The Cortist Reality Ledger is a curated, source-linked registry of consequential AI claims, technical announcements, scientific findings, and questions that require future verification. Each row preserves an original question, the documented evidence, its limitations, a next evidence trigger, direct source links, and a reference to its dated public snapshot.

This is a versioned editorial evidence registry, not a collection of independently verified ground-truth labels, a safety certification, or an AI-company ranking. The data are intended for research discovery, source navigation and longitudinal documentation. They do not establish that any monitored promise has been fulfilled, nor that any unresolved claim has been independently validated.

Release property Value
Snapshot 25 October 2026
Export version 1.0.0
Records 10 (CL-0001 – CL-0010)
Original-source references 12
Public Ledger cortist.com/reality-ledger
Dataset language English
Source snapshots Dated, individually addressable JSON files on Cortist
Independently scored Cortist forecasts 0 at this release

Explore the records

Records span AI safety, AI agents, AI and jobs, AI in medicine, and AI and energy. Initial subjects include OpenAI/METR monitoring, MAI-DxO's retrospective results, Agent Compute Engine's announced preview, AISI's Mythos investigation, payroll indicators, junior hiring, agent sandboxes, training containment, grid rules and independent evaluator arrangements.

Open the public index to see the canonical record references, or browse the Ledger on Cortist.

Repository contents

File Purpose
records.jsonl Canonical Hugging Face dataset, one normalized public record per line.
exports/records.csv Convenient tabular export; not a separate data split.
metadata/source_manifest.json IDs, immutable source-snapshot URLs and SHA-256 hashes of their original JSON content.
scripts/validate_dataset.py Offline structural validation and source-reference checks; does not independently confirm claims.
CHANGELOG.md Export history and update policy.

records.jsonl is the only configured dataset file in this card, avoiding duplicate counting of the CSV export. Hugging Face may label the technical split train; the rows must not be treated as verified training labels.

Core fields

  • id: stable claim identifier, such as CL-0001.
  • claim: the specific question or statement under examination.
  • evidence: Cortist's source-based summary at the export snapshot.
  • limitations: what the evidence does not establish.
  • state, status: descriptive evidence state, not a probability or verification score.
  • source_date: date associated with the original cited source or finding.
  • snapshot_date: date on which the historical Cortist record was published.
  • sources: named external-source links, as a list of objects.
  • next_evidence: what a meaningful future assessment would require.
  • timeline: normalized list of source observations; these are not automatically post-publication status changes.
  • record_url, snapshot_url, snapshot_sha256: provenance and source-file integrity.
  • outcome_resolved, score: explicit false/null at this release.

All ten entries are editorial observations. snapshot_sha256 hashes the unmodified source snapshot on Cortist; formatting and normalization make the exported JSONL row's hash different.

How to load

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("cortist/reality-ledger", split="train")
print(dataset[0]["claim"])
print(dataset[0]["sources"])

Local equivalent:

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("json", data_files="records.jsonl", split="train")

The public Hugging Face dataset repository is available at cortist/reality-ledger. This prepared copy updates only its dataset-card metadata; publication on Hugging Face requires an authorized separate edit.

Collection and transformation

  1. Original, publicly available Cortist ledger snapshot JSON files were read from the production file manifest current at export.
  2. Record IDs (CL-0001–CL-0010), source links, dates, evidence summaries, limitations and follow-up triggers were preserved from those snapshots.
  3. Two historical source schemas were mapped into a consistent JSONL schema. Earlier original-source pairs were normalized from [name, URL] to objects, without adding unsupported original publication dates.
  4. Timelines were transformed into consistent lists of {date, event, detail}. Older event dates are retained as written; they are not asserted to be new revisions.
  5. The exported rows include source JSON SHA-256 values for provenance checking.

No external web pages, third-party articles, proprietary benchmark tables, or Metaculus forecast series are redistributed inside this dataset. The sources values are attribution links, not copies of their content.

Limitations and responsible use

  • Editorial interpretation: Findings come from Cortist's public source-based assessments. A listed primary source can include a company statement rather than an independently reproduced finding.
  • No independent audit: The collection itself has not undergone an independent external quality review. The ten cases have not been independently scored as predictions.
  • Small and selective: Ten curated cases are not representative of all AI systems, all companies or all major announcements.
  • Snapshot, not live monitoring: This export is frozen to 25 October 2026. Later changes must appear in subsequent versioned exports; this repository is not evidence that a continuous Hugging Face sync currently runs.
  • No automatic resolution: A documented, pending or announced state should never be interpreted as a verified outcome or safety rating.
  • Source links may change: Inspect the original publication and its current context before relying on individual conclusions.
  • Not for high-stakes decisions without external review: Do not use as a sole basis for medical, employment, investment, security or regulatory decisions.

For corrections or follow-up evidence, see Cortist's methodology, the What Changed? record, or contact Cortist.

License and provenance

Cortist-owned content and its original compilation in this dataset are licensed CC BY 4.0, including commercial reuse when proper attribution is provided. The grant applies only to material and rights that Cortist owns or may legally license. Linked third-party publications, full texts, photographs, figures, datasets, code, logos and trademarks are excluded and remain subject to their respective owners' rights. Read the full license scope.

For transparency and reproducibility, canonical snapshot links and content hashes are listed in metadata/source_manifest.json. Links are not endorsements and should not be interpreted as independent verification.

Citation

Please cite the archived version-specific DOI when using the initial 25 October 2026 dataset:

Cortist (2026). Cortist Reality Ledger: Initial Public Evidence Snapshot (v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23650580.

Maintained by Cortist. Evidence over hype.

Downloads last month
98