Abstract
An AI-driven framework uses learned ranking and deterministic EDA analysis to recover post-route power while controlling repair costs and preserving timing, electrical, and physical constraints.
Post-route power recovery changes cell choices under tightly coupled timing, electrical and physical constraints, and the value of each change depends on what it costs to repair its side effects. We propose an AI-driven framework in which a learned model drives both phases of the optimization: it ranks the powerrecovery edits to try and the repair actions that follow, while deterministic electronic design automation (EDA) analyses govern every acceptance. The framework records baseline constraint margins, identifies the damage a recovery transaction introduces in each analysis view, holds pre-existing violations at their baseline rather than working them inside the power step, and caps repair spending at a fraction of the measured saving. An ensemble of gradient-boosted models predicts power change, normalized damage reduction and constraint-regression risk from action and timing-context features available before each trial; calibrated, conservative estimates feed separate acquisition scores for recovery and repair, with a deterministic fallback when the model is uncertain. Recovery and repair remain speculative until physical implementation and fresh analysis establish baseline preservation and positive net saving. We specify the contract, the learned policy, the transactional flow and a pre-registered public evaluation protocol on open designs. Evidence from a companion study on public designs supports the contract; the learned policy is proposed, and no trained-model results or proprietary design measurements are reported.
Community
Proposes a framework for post-route power recovery where a learned model ranks power-saving cell edits and their repairs, while deterministic EDA analysis gates every acceptance — plus a pre-registered public evaluation protocol on open designs.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- PACT: Post-route Agentic Checkpoint Tuning for FPGA Timing Closure (2026)
- LATCH: LLM-Assisted Timing Closure Harness for Post-Route FPGA Optimisation (2026)
- Verification Reward Model for Reinforcement Learning in Chip Design Verification (2026)
- Timing-Driven Logic Remapping with Local Physical Context (2026)
- Reference-Preserving Speculative Decoding on Consumer Systems: Diagnosis, Repair Scope, and Measured Cost (2026)
- Guardrailed Meta-Agent Loops: Stress-Testing Policy Pinning, Budget Bounds, and Crash Recovery (2026)
- Structure Before Intelligence: Gating What Agentic Scientific Workflows Release (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.18890 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper