Eurlex-4.3K/num_29_test.csv

uid,text,target,num_keyphrases
33319,"Commission Decision of 22 December 2006 amending Decision 2005/393/EC as regards restricted zones in relation to bluetongue (notified under document number C(2006) 6970)   (Text with EEA relevance). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,Whereas:(1) Directive 2000/75/EC lays down control rules and measures to combat bluetongue in the Community, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones and a ban on animals leaving those zones.(2) Commission Decision 2005/393/EC of 23 May 2005 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue and conditions applying to movements from or through these zones (2) provides for the demarcation of the global geographic areas where protection and surveillance zones (‘the restricted zones’) are to be established by the Member States in relation to bluetongue.(3) On 20 November 2006 Spain informed the Commission that serotype 4 virus has been detected as circulating in a peripheral area of restricted zone E. Consequently that zone should be extended, taking into account of the data available on the ecology of the vector and the current meteorological situation.(4) On 21 November 2006 Germany informed the Commission of new outbreaks of bluetongue in Lower Saxony. In view of those findings, it is appropriate to amend the demarcation of the restricted zone in Germany.(5) Following the notification of outbreaks of bluetongue in early November 2006 by Italy, due to a new serotype, by Decision 2006/858/EC, a new restricted zone G has been added to Annex I to Decision 2005/393/EC to include the three concerned provinces of southern Sardinia. However, the reference to this zone in the respective provisions of Decision 2005/393/EC has not been added. Therefore, for the sake of clarity, the list of zones referred to in Article 2 of Decision 2005/393/EC should be completed.(6) Decision 2005/393/EC should be amended accordingly.(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. Decision 2005/393/EC is amended as follows:1. The first paragraph of Article 2 is replaced by the following:2. Annex I is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 22 December 2006.For the CommissionMarkos KYPRIANOUMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74.(2)  OJ L 130, 24.5.2005, p. 22. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/858/EC (OJ L 332, 30.11.2006, p. 26.)ANNEXAnnex I to Decision 2005/393/EC is amended as follows:1. The list of restricted zones in Zone E (serotype 4) which relates to Spain is replaced by the following:— Autonomous Region of Extremadura: provinces of Cáceres, Badajoz;— Autonomous Region of Andalucia: provinces of Cádiz, Córdoba, Huelva, Jaén (comarcas of Alcalá la Real, Andújar, Huelma, Jaén, Linares, Santiesteban del Puerto, Ubeda), Málaga, Sevilla;— Autonomous Region of Castilla-La Mancha: provinces of Albacete (comarca of Alcaraz), Ciudad Real, Toledo;— Autonomous Region of Castilla y León: provinces of Avila (comarcas of Arenas de San Pedro, Candeleda, Cebreros, El Barco De Ávila, Las Navas del Marqués, Navaluenga, Sotillo de la Adrada), Salamanca (comarcas of Béjar, Ciudad Rodrigo and Sequeros);— Autonomous Region of Madrid: province of Madrid (comarcas of Alcalá de Henares, Aranjuez, Arganda del Rey, Colmenar Viejo, El Escorial, Grinon, Municipio de Madrid, Navalcarnero, San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Torrelaguna, Villarejo de Salvanés).’2. The list of restricted zones in Zone F (serotype 8) which relates to Germany is replaced by the following:
",Germany;FRG;Federal Republic of Germany;German Federal Republic;West Germany;animal disease;animal pathology;epizootic disease;epizooty;disease prevention;prevention of disease;prevention of illness;preventive medicine;prophylaxis;screening for disease;screening for illness;sheep;ewe;lamb;ovine species;agricultural region;agricultural area;trade restriction;obstacle to trade;restriction on trade;trade barrier;transport of animals;Spain;Kingdom of Spain,29
44611,"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1390/2014 of 19 December 2014 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, as regards the substance ‘eprinomectin’  Text with EEA relevance. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 laying down Community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 and amending Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council (1), and in particular Article 14 in conjunction with Article 17 thereof,Having regard to the opinion of the European Medicines Agency formulated by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use,Whereas:(1) The maximum residue limit (‘MRL’) for pharmacologically active substances intended for use in the Union in veterinary medicinal products for food-producing animals or in biocidal products used in animal husbandry is to be established in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 470/2009.(2) Pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding MRLs in foodstuffs of animal origin are set out in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 (2).(3) Eprinomectin is currently included in Table 1 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as an allowed substance, for bovine, ovine and caprine species, applicable to muscle, fat, liver, kidney and milk. The provisional maximum residue limits for that substance set out for ovine and caprine species, applicable to muscle, fat, liver, kidney and milk expired on 1 July 2014.(4) The Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) recommended an extension of the provisional MRL as the analytical method for monitoring residues in ovine and caprine species is not sufficiently validated. The incomplete scientific data on the validation of the analytical method is not considered to constitute a hazard to human health.(5) In accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 the European Medicines Agency is to consider using MRLs established for a pharmacologically active substance in a particular foodstuff for another foodstuff derived from the same species, or MRLs established for a pharmacologically active substance in one or more species for other species. The CVMP concluded that the extrapolation to other food producing species cannot be supported for this substance.(6) The entry for eprinomectin in Table 1 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 should therefore be amended to extend the provisional MRL to 30 June 2016.(7) It is appropriate to provide for a reasonable period of time for the stakeholders concerned to take measures that may be required to comply with the newly set MRL.(8) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Veterinary Medicinal Products,. The Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation. This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.It shall apply from 22 February 2015.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 19 December 2014.For the CommissionThe PresidentJean-Claude JUNCKER(1)  OJ L 152, 16.6.2009, p. 11.(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin (OJ L 15, 20.1.2010, p. 1).ANNEXIn Table 1 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, the entry for the substance ‘eprinomectin’ is replaced by the following:Pharmacologically active Substance Marker residue Animal Species MRL Target Tissues Other Provisions (according to Article 14(7) of Regulation (EC) No 470/2009) Therapeutic classification‘Eprinomectin Eprinomectin B1a Bovine 50 μg/kg Muscle NO ENTRY Antiparasitic agents/Agents acting against endo- and ectoparasites’Ovine, caprine 50 μg/kg Muscle Provisional maximum residue limits expire on 30 June 2016
",sheep;ewe;lamb;ovine species;foodstuff;agri-foodstuffs product;animal product;livestock product;product of animal origin;cattle;bovine species;breed of cattle;buffalo;full-grown cattle;ruminant;goat;billy-goat;caprine species;kid;market approval;ban on sales;marketing ban;sales ban;veterinary drug;veterinary medicines;food safety;food product safety;food quality safety;safety of food,29
35119,"2008/441/EC: Commission Decision of 4 June 2008 on a financial contribution from the Community towards emergency measures to combat avian influenza in Germany in 2007 (notified under document number C(2008) 2345). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field (1), and in particular Articles 3(3) and 3a(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) Decision 90/424/EEC lays down the procedures governing the Community’s financial contribution towards specific veterinary measures, including emergency measures. Pursuant to Article 3a of that Decision, Member States may obtain a Community financial contribution towards the costs of certain measures to eradicate avian influenza.(2) Article 3a(3) of Decision 90/424/EEC lays down rules on the percentage of the costs incurred by Member States that may be covered by the Community’s financial contribution.(3) Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC (2), following the amendment of Decision 90/424/EEC by Council Decision 2006/53/EC (3), no longer covers avian influenza. It is therefore necessary to expressly provide in the present Decision that the granting of a Community financial contribution to Germany is subject to compliance with certain rules laid down in that Regulation.(4) Outbreaks of avian influenza occurred in Germany in 2007. The emergence of that disease represents a serious risk to the Community’s livestock population. Germany took the measures, as referred to in Article 3a(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC, to combat those outbreaks.(5) Germany has fully complied with its technical and administrative obligations as set out in Articles 3(3) and 3a(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.(6) Germany submitted to the Commission information on the costs incurred on 30 August 2007, and has continued to provide all necessary information on costs of compensation and operational expenditure.(7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. Financial contribution from the Community to Germany1.   A financial contribution from the Community may be granted to Germany towards the costs incurred by that Member State in taking the measures referred to in Article 3a(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC, to combat avian influenza in 2007.2.   For the purposes of this Decision, Articles 2 to 5 and Article 7 and Article 9(2), (3) and (4) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 shall apply mutatis mutandis. Payment arrangementsA first tranche of EUR 320 000 shall be paid as part of the Community financial contribution provided for in Article 1. AddresseeThis Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.. Done at Brussels, 4 June 2008.For the CommissionAndroulla VASSILIOUMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 19. Decision as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).(2)  OJ L 55, 1.3.2005, p. 12.(3)  OJ L 29, 2.2.2006, p. 37.
",Germany;FRG;Federal Republic of Germany;German Federal Republic;West Germany;animal disease;animal pathology;epizootic disease;epizooty;disease prevention;prevention of disease;prevention of illness;preventive medicine;prophylaxis;screening for disease;screening for illness;bird;bird of prey;migratory bird;EU aid;Community aid;Community support;European Union aid;aid from the EU;aid from the European Union;emergency aid;financial aid;capital grant;financial grant,29
2495,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 2729/98 of 17 December 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 2628/97 as regards transitional provisions for the start-up period of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (1), and in particular Article 10(f) thereof,Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 2628/97 (2), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2105/98 (3), lays down detailed rules on the transitional provisions for the start-up period of the system to identify and register bovine animals;Whereas, in the light of the practical difficulties involved in identifying for a second time bovine animals born before 1 January 1998 by tagging them with new ear-tags, the rules laid down earlier for bovine animals born after 1 January 1998 should also be applied to them;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,. In Article 1(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2628/97, 'are born after 1 January 1998` is hereby deleted. This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 17 December 1998.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 117, 7. 5. 1997, p. 1.(2) OJ L 354, 30. 12. 1997, p. 17.(3) OJ L 267, 2. 10. 1998, p. 4.
",health control;biosafety;health inspection;health inspectorate;health watch;meat product;bacon;cold meats;corned beef;foie gras;frogs' legs;goose liver;ham;meat extract;meat paste;prepared meats;processed meat product;pâté;sausage;beef;database;data bank;cattle;bovine species;breed of cattle;buffalo;full-grown cattle;ruminant;labelling,29
32311,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2006 of  19 April 2006  initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 on imports of silicon originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, and making such imports subject to registration. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (the basic Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 13(3) and Article 14(5) thereof,After having consulted the Advisory Committee,Whereas:A.   REQUEST(1) The Commission has received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China.(2) The request was lodged on 6 March 2006 by Euro Alliages on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, i.e. 100 % of the Community production of silicon.B.   PRODUCT(3) The product concerned by the possible circumvention is silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China, normally declared under CN code ex 2804 69 00 (the product concerned). This code is given for information only.(4) The product under investigation is silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea (the product under investigation) normally declared under the same code as the product concerned.C.   EXISTING MEASURES(5) The measures currently in force and possibly being circumvented are antidumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 (2).D.   GROUNDS(6) The request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the anti-dumping measures on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China are being circumvented by means of the transhipment via Republic of Korea of silicon.(7) The evidence submitted is as follows:E.   PROCEDURE(8) In the light of the above, the Commission has concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation and to make imports of silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, subject to registration, in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.(a)   Questionnaires(9) In order to obtain the information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send questionnaires to the exporters/producers and to the associations of exporters/producers in the Republic of Korea, to the exporters/producers and to the associations of exporters/producers in the People’s Republic of China, to the importers and to the associations of importers in the Community which cooperated in the investigation that led to the existing measures and to the authorities of the People’s Republic of China and Republic of Korea. Information, as appropriate, may also be sought from the Community industry.(10) In any event, all interested parties should contact the Commission forthwith, but not later than the time-limit set in Article 3 of this Regulation in order to find out whether they are listed in the request and, if necessary, request a questionnaire within the time-limit set in Article 3(1) of this Regulation, given that the time limit set in Article 3(2) of this Regulation applies to all interested parties.(11) The authorities of the People's Republic of China and Republic of Korea will be notified of the initiation of the investigation.(b)   Collection of information and holding of hearings(12) All interested parties are hereby invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence. Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.(c)   Exemption of imports from registration or measures(13) In accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product under investigation may be exempted from registration or measures if such importation does not constitute circumvention.(14) Since the possible circumvention takes place outside the Community, exemptions may be granted, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, to producers of the product concerned that can show that they are not related to any producer subject to the measures and that are found not to be engaged in circumvention practices as defined in Article 13(1) and 13(2) of the basic Regulation. Producers wishing to obtain an exemption should submit a request duly supported by evidence within the time-limit indicated in Article 3(3) of this Regulation.F.   REGISTRATION(15) Pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product under investigation should be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings of circumvention, anti-dumping duties of an appropriate amount can be levied retroactively from the date of registration of such imports consigned from the Republic of Korea.G.   TIME-LIMITS(16) In the interest of sound administration, time-limits should be stated within which:— interested parties may make themselves known to the Commission, present their views in writing and submit questionnaire replies or any other information to be taken into account during the investigation,— producers in the Republic of Korea may request exemption of imports from registration or measures,— interested parties may make a written request to be heard by the Commission.(17) Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on the party’s making itself known within the time-limits mentioned in Article 3 of this Regulation.H.   NON-COOPERATION(18) In cases in which any interested party refuses access to or does not provide the necessary information within the time-limits, or significantly impedes the investigation, provisional or final findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available.(19) Where it is found that any interested party has supplied false or misleading information, the information shall be disregarded and use may be made of facts available. If an interested party does not cooperate or cooperates only partially and findings are therefore based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the result may be less favourable to that party than if it had cooperated,. An investigation is hereby initiated pursuant to Article 13(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96, in order to determine if imports into the Community of silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, falling within CN code ex 2804 69 00 (TARIC code 2804690010), are circumventing the measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 398/2004. The Customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 13(3) and Article 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Community identified in Article 1 of this Regulation.Registration shall expire nine months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation.The Commission, by Regulation, may direct customs authorities to cease registration in respect of imports into the Community of products manufactured by producers having applied for an exemption of registration and having been found not to be circumventing the anti-dumping duties. 1.   Questionnaires should be requested from the Commission within 15 days of the date of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union.2.   Interested parties, if their representations are to be taken into account during the investigation, must make themselves known by contacting the Commission, present their views in writing and submit questionnaire replies or any other information within 40 days from the date of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union, unless otherwise specified.3.   Producers in the Republic of Korea requesting exemption of imports from registration or measures should submit a request duly supported by evidence within the same 40-day time-limit.4.   Interested parties may also apply to be heard by the Commission within the same 40-day time-limit.5.   Any information relating to the matter, any request for a hearing or for a questionnaire as well as any request for exemption of imports from registration or measures must be made in writing (not in electronic format, unless otherwise specified) and must indicate the name, address, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers of the interested party. All written submissions, including the information requested in this Regulation, questionnaire replies and correspondence provided by interested parties on a confidential basis shall be labelled as ‘Limited’ (3) and, in accordance with Article 19(2) of the basic Regulation, shall be accompanied by a non-confidential version, which will be labelled ‘For inspection by interested parties’.Commission address for correspondence:European CommissionDirectorate General for TradeDirectorate BOffice: J-79 5/16B-1049 BrusselsFax (32-2) 295 65 05 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 19 April 2006.For the CommissionPeter MANDELSONMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).(2)  OJ L 66, 4.3.2004, p. 15.(3)  This means that the document is for internal use only. It is protected pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43). It is a confidential document pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation and Article 6 of the WTO Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 (Anti-dumping Agreement).
",anti-dumping legislation;anti-dumping code;anti-dumping proceeding;South Korea;Republic of Korea;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;semi-metal;arsenic;boron;selenium;silicon;tellurium;anti-dumping duty;final anti-dumping duty;temporary anti-dumping duty;complaint to the Commission;complaint about failure to take action;infringement of EU law;breach of Community law;breach of EU law;breach of European Union law;infringement of Community law;infringement of European Union law;infringement of the EC Treaty;China;People’s Republic of China,29
38049,"Council Implementing Decision of 15 October 2010 authorising the Italian Republic to continue to apply a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1), and in particular Article 395(1) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Whereas:(1) In a letter registered by the Commission’s Secretariat-General on 10 December 2009, Italy requested authorisation for a measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to continue to exempt from value added tax (VAT) certain taxable persons. Through that measure, those taxable persons would continue to be exempted from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.(2) The Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 11 January 2010 of the request made by Italy. By letter dated 12 January 2010, the Commission notified Italy that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.(3) A special scheme for small enterprises is available to Member States under Title XII of Directive 2006/112/EC. The measure to be extended derogates from Article 285 of that Directive in its application to Italy only in so far as the annual turnover threshold for the scheme is higher than the EUR 5 000 threshold.(4) By Council Decision 2008/737/EC of 15 September 2008 authorising the Italian Republic to apply a measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (2), Italy was authorised, as a derogating measure, to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 30 000 until 31 December 2010. Given that this higher threshold has resulted in reduced VAT obligations for the smallest businesses, whilst the latter may still opt for the normal VAT arrangements in accordance with Article 290 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Italy should be authorised to apply the measure for a further limited period.(5) In its proposal of 29 October 2004 for a Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC with a view to simplifying value added tax obligations, the Commission included provisions aimed at allowing Member States to set the annual turnover ceiling for the VAT exemption scheme at up to EUR 100 000 or the equivalent in national currency, with the possibility of updating that amount each year. The extension request submitted by Italy is compatible with that proposal.(6) From information provided by Italy, the measure has led to an estimated reduction of the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the final stage of consumption of less than 0,2 %.(7) The derogation has no impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT,. By way of derogation from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Italy is authorised to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 30 000.Italy may raise that ceiling in order to maintain the value of the exemption in real terms. This Decision shall take effect on the day of its notification.This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2011 until the date of entry into force of a Directive amending the amounts of the annual turnover ceilings below which taxable persons may be exempted from VAT, or until 31 December 2013, whichever date is the earlier. This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.. Done at Luxembourg, 15 October 2010.For the CouncilThe PresidentE. SCHOUPPE(1)  OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 249, 18.9.2008, p. 13.
",tax harmonisation;harmonisation of tax systems;tax harmonization;Italy;Italian Republic;provision of services;basis of tax assessment;common basis of assessment;tax liability;taxation basis;uniform basis of assessment;tax relief;relief from taxes;tax abatement;tax advantage;tax allowance;tax concession;tax credit;tax deduction;tax reduction;VAT;turnover tax;value added tax;distributive trades;distribution network;distribution policy;distribution structure;sales network;tax exemption,29
1819,"Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1410/81 of 25 May 1981 laying down detailed rules for the application of the common measure for the development of beef cattle production in Ireland and Northern Ireland. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1054/81 of 21 April 1981 establishing a common measure for the development of beef cattle production in Ireland and Northern Ireland (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,Whereas, according to Article 3 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1054/81, detailed rules for the application of measures for the intensification of performance testing and progeny testing of beef bulls, the encouragement of greater use of artificial insemination in cattle and of lime on pastureland and the encouragement of silage-making are to be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18 (2) and (3) of Council Directive 72/159/EEC (2);Whereas the aid measures for the intensification of beef cattle performance and progeny testing may include the capital cost of providing additional facilities, aids to reduce breeders' costs in connexion with testing, the payment of premiums to pedigree breeders in connexion with the subjection of certain sires to progeny testing and the purchase of additional bulls for progeny testing;Whereas minimum quality and disease prevention standards should be observed in the provision of artificial insemination;Whereas minimum technical specifications should be laid down for the various forms of lime to receive aid;Whereas aid for the encouragement of silage-making should be confined to farmers making silage for the first time for use on their own farm ; whereas adequate measures must be taken for the protection of the silage and prevention of pollution ; whereas the advisory services should provide farmers with advice on these matters to ensure that good quality silage is made;Whereas, because of the adverse income situation for farmers in Ireland and Northern Ireland and because of the seasonal nature, of the measures, it is necessary to apply them as soon as possible;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Structure,. Article 11. Measures for the intensification of beef cattle performance and progeny testing within the meaning of Article 3 (1) (a) and (b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1054/81 shall include only:    (a) the purchase or provision of additional:      - mobile equipment for on-farm weight recording of pedigree beef herds,- buildings and facilities for the beef performance testing of extra beef and dual-purpose bulls. The facilities may include feeding, cleaning, weighing, recording and handling facilities as well as ultrasonic scanners for the measurement of carcase and meat characteristics,- accommodation for bulls undergoing beef progeny tests at recognized centres,- bulls to be progeny tested at recognized centres,- equipment and sampling for the measurement of carcase and meat characteristics of the progeny of bulls on progeny test,- calf accommodation for the beef progeny testing of bulls at recognized centres;(b) development of a computer-processing system for the collation and utilization of on-farm weight records;(1) OJ No L 111, 23.4.1981, p. 1.  (2) OJ No L 96, 23.4.1972, p. 1.        (c) the reduction of pedigree beef breeders' costs for on-farm recording of beef herds and performance testing of beef bulls,(d) payment of a premium per progeny of selected bulls on progeny test born in pedigree beef herds being recorded.2. Performance and progeny-test results shall be published and be available to the buyers of bulls and semen. 1. Aid for the encouragement of artificial insemination as provided for in Article 3 (1) (c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1054/81 may be granted for the reduction of farmers' costs for first inseminations of cattle made annually subject to the following conditions:    (a) the amount of such aid shall be indicated to farmers on insemination documents;(b) where do-it-yourself artificial insemination is authorized, the aid shall not exceed 1 77 ECU (A) per first insemination;(c) measures shall be taken to:      - ensure that facilities for artificial insemination meet adequate standards as regards the facilities themselves, operating staff, quality of bulls and quality of semen,- avoid the spread of disease by artificial insemination,- control the price of artificial insemination.2. Measures for the encouragement of the use of lime as provided for in Article 3 (1) (d) of Regulation (EEC) No 1054/81 may be undertaken on the following conditions:    (a) aid shall be available only for lime used by farmers for the improvement of pastures and meadows;(b) in areas covered by other common measures within the meaning of Article 6 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3509/80 (2), the amount of aid available for the initial application of lime under those measures shall not be increased by this Regulation;(c) the various forms of lime must meet the existing minimum standards.Advisory services should be available to advise farmers on lime requirements.3. Aids for the improvement of the quality and quantity of winter feed supplies through encouraging greater conservation and use of silage as provided for in Article 3 (1) (e) of Regulation (EEC) No 1054/81:    (a) available to farmers making silage for the first time:      - it the silage is for use on their own farms,- if the silage is suitably sited and adequately covered and protected,- if measures are taken to prevent pollution by silage effluent;(b) shall be calculated per tonne of silage (one tonne is equivalent to 1 713 cubic metres or 40 cubic feet).Advisory services should be available to advise farmers on making good quality silage. The Member States concerned shall communicate to the Commission a report on the results of the application of this Regulation each year not later than 31 March, and for the first time not later than 31 March 1982. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.(1) OJ No L 94, 28.4.1970, p. 13.  (2) OJ No L 367, 31.12.1980, p. 87.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 25 May 1981.For the CommissionPoul DALSAGERMember of the Commission
",Ireland;Eire;Southern Ireland;Northern Ireland;artificial insemination;animal insemination;bovine insemination;caprine insemination;insemination of animals;insemination of cattle;insemination of goats;insemination of pigs;insemination of sheep;ovine insemination;porcine insemination;grassland;grazing land;land under grass;ley;meadow;pasture;beef;fodder;dry fodder;forage;green fodder;hay;silage;straw,29
36582,"Council Decision 2009/570/CFSP of 27 July 2009 amending and extending Decision 2008/901/CFSP concerning the independent international fact-finding mission on the conflict in Georgia. ,Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 13(3) and Article 23(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) On 1 September 2008, the European Council stated that the European Union is ready to commit itself to support every effort to secure a peaceful and lasting solution to the conflicts in Georgia, and that it is ready to support confidence-building measures.(2) On 15 September 2008, the Council supported the idea of an independent international inquiry into the conflict in Georgia, and on 2 December 2008 it adopted Council Decision 2008/901/CFSP (1) concerning an independent international fact-finding mission on the conflict in Georgia, for the period from 2 December 2008 to 31 July 2009.(3) On 3 July 2009, the Political and Security Committee recommended that the fact-finding mission be extended for an additional two months,. Decision 2008/901/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:1. Article 2(1) shall be replaced by the following:2. The second subparagraph of Article 5 shall be replaced by the following: This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Brussels, 27 July 2009.For the CouncilThe PresidentC. BILDT(1)  OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 66.
",EU financing;Community financing;European Union financing;settlement of disputes;conflict resolution;conflict settlement;dispute settlement;peace negotiations;OSCE;Belgrade Conference;CSCE;Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe;Helsinki Final Act;Madrid Conference;Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe;Vienna Conference;Georgia;common foreign and security policy;CFSP;European foreign policy;common foreign policy;common security policy;the EU's international role;EC participation in an international meeting;EC representation in an international organisation;the Community's international role;the international role of the European Union;international conflict;international crisis,29
622,"Regulation (EEC) No 2768/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 laying down general rules for granting export refunds on pigmeat and criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 (1) of 29 October 1975 on the common organization of the market in pigmeat, and in particular Article 15 (4) thereof;Having regard to the proposal from the Commission;Whereas export refunds on products subject to the common organization of the market in pigmeat must be fixed in accordance with certain criteria which would make it possible to cover the difference between prices for those products within the Community and on the world market ; whereas, to this end, the supply situation and prices for those products within the Community and the price situation on the world market must be taken into account;Whereas the difference between prices within the Community and prices on the world market for the quantity of feed grain required for the production of one kilogramme of pigmeat must also be taken into account ; whereas for products other than pig carcases the coefficients referred to in Article 10 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 should be taken into account;Whereas if price trends are to be noted, prices must be determined in accordance with general principles ; whereas, to this end, prices on third country markets and in countries of destination, producer prices recorded in third countries and free-at-Community-frontier prices should be taken into account when prices on the world market are being determined ; whereas, in the absence of representative markets for pigmeat products, prices ruling at the various marketing stages and on exportation should be used as a basis in determining Community prices;Whereas provision must be made for varying the amount of the refund according to the destination of the products, since markets in the countries of destination are at varying distances from Community markets and special conditions apply to imports in certain countries of destination;Whereas, to give Community exporters a measure of stability as regards the amount of the refund and certainty with regard to the list of products eligible for a refund, provision should be made for such list and amounts to remain valid for a relatively long period ; whereas rules should also be laid down governing the advance fixing of the export refunds;Whereas it is necessary to fix refunds in advance only in certain cases ; whereas any decision to do so should be taken in accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75;Whereas the possibility of fixing refunds in advance makes it necessary to take steps to ensure that in every case exportation is carried out as stated in the application ; whereas to that end each applicant should receive a certificate requiring the goods in question to be exported within a given period;Whereas in order to avoid abuse the issue of such certificates should be conditional upon the provision of security, which should be forfeited if the goods are not exported within the period of validity of the certificates;Whereas experience gained in the various sectors where a common organization of the market has been established and in which there is provision for advance fixing of the refund has shown that in certain circumstances, and in particular where exporters have abnormal recourse to this system, there is a risk of difficulties arising on the market concerned;Whereas in order to remedy such a situation it must be possible for measures to be taken rapidly ; whereas provision should therefore be made for the Commission to adopt such measures after receiving the Opinion of the Management Committee or, in cases of urgency, without waiting for the latter to meet;  (1)See page 1 of this Official Journal.Whereas, to avoid distortions of competition between individual Community traders, the administrative conditions under which they operate must be identical throughout the Community ; whereas there does not appear to be any justification for granting a refund where the products in question are imported from third countries and re-exported to third countries ; whereas the reimbursement, under certain conditions, of the levy charged on importation is sufficient to allow these products to be placed on the world market again,. This Regulation lays down rules for fixing and granting export refunds on the products specified in Article 1 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75. The following shall be taken into account when refunds are being fixed:    (a) the existing situation and the future trend with regard to:      - prices and availabilities of pigmeat products on the Community market,- prices for pigmeat products on the world market;(b) the need to avoid disturbances which might lead to a prolonged imbalance between supply and demand on the Community market ; and(c) the economic aspect of the proposed exports.When the refund on the products specified in Article 1 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 is being calculated, account shall also be taken of the difference between prices within the Community and prices on the world market for the quantity of feed grain determined in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 (1) (a) of that Regulation, the coefficients referred to in Article 10 (4) of that Regulation also being taken into account in the case of products other than pig carcases. 1. The following shall be taken into account when the price on the Community market is being determined:    (a) prices ruling at the various marketing stages in the Community;(b) prices ruling on exportation.2. The following shall be taken into account when the price on the world market is being determined:    (a) prices ruling on third country markets;(b) the most favourable import prices in third countries of destination for third country imports;(c) producer prices recorded in exporting third countries, account being taken of any subsidies granted by those countries ; and(d) free-at-Community-frontier offer prices. Where the world market situation or the specific requirements of certain markets make this necessary, the refund for the Community may in the case of the products specified in Article 1 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 be varied according to destination. 1. The list of products on which an export refund is granted and the amount of such refund shall be fixed at least once every three months.2. The amount of the refund shall be that applicable on the day of exportation.3. However, it may be decided that the refund shall, upon request, be fixed in advance. In that case, where the applicant so requests when lodging an application for a certificate of advance fixing as provided for in Article 6, the export refund applicable on the day when he lodges such application shall apply to an export operation carried out at any time during the period of validity of the said certificate.4. Where examination of the market situation shows that there are difficulties due to the application of the provison concerning the advance fixing of the export refund, or that such difficulties may occur, a decision may be taken in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 to suspend for no longer than is strictly necessary the application of these provisions.In cases of extreme urgency, the Commission may, after examination of the situation, decide on the basis of all the information available to it to suspend advance fixing for a maximum of three working days.Applications for certificates of advance fixing lodged during the period of suspension shall be rejected. 1. The granting of the refund under the conditions laid down in Article 5 (3) shall be conditional on the presentation of a certificate of advance fixing, which shall be issued by Member States to any applicant irrespective of his place of establishment in the Community.Such certificates shall be valid throughout the Community.2. The issue of a certificate of advance fixing shall be conditional upon the provision of security guaranteeing that the exportation will be carried out within the period of validity of the certificate. If the operation is not carried out, or only partially carried out, within that period, the security shall be wholly or partially forfeit. 1. The refund shall be paid upon proof:    - that the products concerned have been exported from the Community, and- except where Article 8 applies, that such products are of Community origin.2. Where Article 4 applies, the refund shall be paid under the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, provided it is proved that the product has reached the destination for which the refund was fixed.Exceptions may be made to this rule in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 3, provided conditions are laid down which offer equivalent guarantees.3. Additional provisions may be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75. No export refund shall be granted on products specified in Article 1 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 which are imported from third countries and re-exported to third countries, unless the exporter proves:    - that the product to be exported and the product previously imported are one and the same, and- that the levy was charged on importation.In such cases the refund on each product shall be equal to the levy charged on importation or the refund applicable on the day of exportation, whichever is the lower. 1. Council Regulation No 177/67/EEC (1) of 27 June 1967 laying down general rules for granting export refunds on pigmeat and criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2686/72 (2), is hereby repealed.2. References to the Regulation repealed by paragraph 1 shall be construed as references to this Regulation.References to Articles of that Regulation are to be read in accordance with the correlation given in the Annex. 0This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 November 1975.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Luxembourg, 29 October 1975.For the CouncilThe PresidentG. MARCORA(1)OJ No 130, 28.6.1967, p. 2614/67. (2)OJ No L 289, 27.12.1972, p. 37.ANNEXCorrelation>PIC FILE= ""T9000473"">
",swine;boar;hog;pig;porcine species;sow;market prices;meat product;bacon;cold meats;corned beef;foie gras;frogs' legs;goose liver;ham;meat extract;meat paste;prepared meats;processed meat product;pâté;sausage;export refund;Community aid to exports;advance determination of refunds;amount of refund;fixing of refund;maximum refund;pigmeat;pork,29
4148,"2006/14/EC: Commission Decision of  11 January 2006  amending Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession as regards certain establishments in the meat, milk and fish sectors in Poland  (notified under document number C(2005) 6023)   (Text with EEA relevance). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (1), and in particular Annex XII, Chapter 6, Section B, Subsection I(1), paragraph (e) thereto,Whereas:(1) Poland has been granted transitional periods for certain establishments listed in Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession.(2) Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession has been amended by Commission Decisions 2004/458/EC (2), 2004/471/EC (3), 2004/474/EC (4), 2005/271/EC (5), 2005/591/EC (6) and 2005/854/EC (7).(3) According to an official declaration from the Polish competent authority certain establishments in the meat, milk and fish sectors have completed their upgrading process and are now in full compliance with Community legislation. Furthermore certain establishments have ceased activities for which they have obtained a transitional period. Those establishments should therefore be deleted from the list of establishments in transition.(4) Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession should therefore be amended accordingly.(5) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has been informed of the measures provided for in this Decision,. The establishments listed in the Annex to this Decision are deleted from Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 11 January 2006.For the CommissionMarkos KYPRIANOUMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33.(2)  OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 52, as corrected by OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 39.(3)  OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 58, as corrected by OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 31.(4)  OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 74, as corrected by OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 44.(5)  OJ L 86, 5.4.2005, p. 13.(6)  OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 96.(7)  OJ L 316, 2.12.2005, p. 17.ANNEXList of establishments to be deleted from Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of AccessionMEAT SECTORRed meatInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment62. 12070201 Przedsiębiorstwo Wielobranżowe „LASKOPOL” Sp. J.163. 24640302 Miłkowska Spółka Komandytowa200. 30040207 P.P.H.U. „MAR-POL” Marek Pazola203. 30070102 P.H.U. „JUREX” K. NowakPoultry meatInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment24. 14130502 Przedsiębiorstwo Uboju i Przetwórstwa Drobiu „Ilczak” Sp. z o.o.51. 30280501 Zakład Wielobranżowy „STENDRÓB”Red meatSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment3. 04090202 Z.P.M. „Bolan” Bolesław Wojtasik9. 06030202 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego KOMPLEKS Stępień, Panasiuk. Stępień Sp. J.32. 12070211 P.P.H.U. „Markam” Andrzej Marek Skolarus38. 12100107 Skup i Ubój Zwierząt Rzeźnych Sp. J., Mikulec Czesław, Janusz, Paweł46. 12620308 Zakład Garmażeryjno-Wędliniarski, Stanisław Poręba48. 14074201 RECREO Zakład Mięsny Maciej Antoniak53. 14250213 Zakład Masarski „KRAWCZYK”59. 18030102 Ubojnia Zwierząt Rzeźnych P.P.M. „Taurus” Sp. z o.o.66. 18190204 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego Marek Leśniak69. 20120101 P.P.H.U. „Stan”72. 24030306 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego „Jan Bielesz” Sp. z o.o.75. 24100315 P.H.U. „ADAM-POL”, Adam Gajdzik ul. Rolnicza 579. 24770301 P.P.U.H. Burakowski80. 24774002 Zakłady Mięsne „BRADO. 2” SA w Tomicach, Oddział nr 2 Ubojnia w Tomicach81. 26020104 „POL.MIĘS” Ubojnia Zwierząt, Mirosław Kwiecień82. 26020304 „WIR” Szproch i Pietrusiewicz Przetwórstwo Mięsa Spółka Jawna84. 26040209 Zakład Rzeźniczo-Wędliniarski, Zakład nr 286. 26110203 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego „Jawor” Janusz Stefański91. 28120101 Przedsiębiorstwo Wielobranżowe Kazimierz Pawlicki95. 30040204 Rzeźnictwo-Wędliniarstwo Z.J. Konarczak97. 30170601 Drop SA100. 06030202 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego „Kompleks”, Stępień, Panasiuk, Stępień Sp. J. 22-110 Ruda Huta, Leśniczówka115. 32610201 Pomorski Przemysł Mięsny „Agros Koszalin. S.A.” 75-209 Koszalin, ul. BoWiD 1117. 04113801 Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowe Eksport-Import, Roman Zalewski, Morawy, 88-210 Dobre119. 04010205 Zakład Rzeźniczo-Wędliniarski, Krzysztof Kotrych, Śliwkowo 7, 87-731 Waganiec126. 12110202 Firma „BATCZEW” Stanisław Komperda, Zakład Masarski, Morawczyna 111, 34-404 Klikuszowa133. 22050309 GS „SCH” Żukowo 83-330 Żukowo, ul. 3 Maja 9E140. 24750318 P.P.U.H. „PAT-TRADE” Sp. z o.o., 41-200 Sosnowiec, ul. Kościuszkowców 16 b141. 24750306 Zakład Rzeźniczo-Wędliniarski Bogdan Janik, 41-209 Sosnowiec, ul. Chmielna 14156. 4780302 Warsztat Wędliniarski „Myrcik” Sp. J., 41-800 Zabrze, ul. Paderewskiego 28–30157. 24164003 P.P.H.U. „JAN*M*JAN” S.C., 42-400 Zawiercie, ul. Senatorska 13160. 30050303 Waldi Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego, 62-065 Grodzisk Wielkopolski, ul. Powstańców Chocieszyńskich 97169. 2150201 Rzeźnictwo i Wędliniarstwo Elżbieta i Stanisław Zimorodzcy 78-400 Szczecinek Dalęcino 41APoultry meatSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment171. 10143902 F.H. „Alma” Ubój i Dzielenie Drobiu w Cieniach172. 12100401 P.P.H. Drobeksan w Nowym Sączu Ubojnia Drobiu175. 6610501 Opolskie Zakłady Drobiarskie w Opolu182. 0050501 Grupa Producentów Drobiu „BOBROWNIKI” Sp. z o.o., Bobrowniki, 99-418 Bełchów183. 0100531 Zakłady Drobiarskie, „DROB-BOGS”, Jacek Bogusławski Kaleń 5, 97-320 Wolbórz188. 24010402 Ubojnia Drobiu „Jolgus” 42-583 Bobrowniki, ul. Akacjowa 203Cold storesSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment197. 16611101 Przedsiębiorstwo Przemysłu Chłodniczego, „FRIGOPOL” SA199. 24121101 POLARIS, Chłodnie Śląskie Sp. z o.o. Chłodnia200. 14251101 Zakład Przetwórstwa Spożywczego „MAKÓW” Sp. z o.o., Chłodnia Składowa Maków, ul. Lipowa 91, 26-640 SkaryszewMilk sectorInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment11. 04141601 SM „Świecka”102. 30171601 OSM Ostrów Wlkp.113. 32151601 „Elmilk” Sp. z o.o.Supplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment1. 02251601 Okręgowa Spółdzielnia Mleczarska w Zgorzelcu6. 10031601 Okręgowa Spółdzielnia Mleczarska Łask17. 30211602 Bukowsko-Grodziska SM ZP w Buku18. 30641601 Mleczarnia Naramowice Sp. z o.o. w Poznaniu25. 12071601 OSM w Limanowej, ul. Starodworska 6, Zakład produkcyjny Limanowa26. 12071603 OSM w Limanowej Zakład Produkcyjny Tymbark27. 16011603 Okręgowa Spółdzielnia Mleczarska w Brzegu Oddział Produkcyjny w Lewinie, Brzeskim ul. Marii Konopnickiej 1, 49-340 Lewin Brzeski29. 22051601 Okręgowa Spółdzielnia Mleczarska 83-300 Kartuzy, ul. Mściwoja II 1Fish sectorInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment8. 14191802 P.P.H.U. „Manta” ZPR35. 32081814 „P.P.H. Tunex” KobylińscySupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment4. 22021802 R.M. Jacek Schomburg Zakład w Brusach7. 28141802 Gospodarstwo Rybackie Sp. z o.o. w likwidacji Przetwórnia Ryb w Rusi11. 12061804 Zakład Przetwórstwa Rybnego „KRAK-FISH”, Marek Piekara, Antoni Solecki, Sp. J. Poskwitów 13612. 22051804 Handel i Przetwórstwo Ryb „Belona”, Helena Wenta, ul. Piwna 21, 83-340 Sierakowice13. 22061801 Rybołówstwo Morskie, Jacek Schomburg, z siedzibą w Helu Zakład w Karsinie, ul. Długa 29, 83-440 Karsin14. 22081811 P.H.U. Przetwórstwo Rybne BOJA, 84-300 Lębork, ul. Majkowskiego 217. 22141803 Przetwórnia Ryb „Kamila” Kolonia Ostrowicka, 83-135 Mała Karczma19. 22151805 Firma Produkcyjno-Handlowa „MAS”, Warszkowo Młyn, 84-106 Leśniewo20. 22151814 DanPol fish Sp. z o.o., ul. Robakowska 75, 84-241 Gościcino
",accession to the European Union;EU accession;accession to the Community;act of accession;application for accession;consequence of accession;request for accession;meat processing industry;cutting premises;cutting-up premises;slaughterhouse;dairy industry;dairy;health legislation;health regulations;health standard;transitional period (EU);EC limited period;EC transitional measures;EC transitional period;transition period (EU);fish;piscicultural species;species of fish;Poland;Republic of Poland;European standard;Community standard;Euronorm,29
22783,"2002/432/EC: Commission Decision of 22 March 2001 approving the single programming document for Community structural assistance under Objective 2 in the region of Alsace in France (notified under document number C(2001) 626). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds(1), and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,After consulting the Committee on the Development and Conversion of Regions, the Committee pursuant to Article 147 of the Treaty and the Committee on Agricultural Structures and Rural Development,Whereas:(1) Articles 13 et seq. of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 lay down the procedure for preparing and implementing single programming documents.(2) Article 15(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 provides that, after consultation with the partners referred to in Article 8 of the Regulation, the Member State may submit to the Commission a development plan which is treated as a draft single programming document, and which contains the information referred to in Article 16 of the Regulation.(3) Under Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, on the basis of the regional development plan submitted by the Member State and within the partnership established in accordance with Article 8 of that Regulation, the Commission is to take a decision on the single programming document, in agreement with the Member State concerned and in accordance with the procedures laid down in Articles 48 to 51.(4) The French Government submitted to the Commission on 28 April 2000 an acceptable draft single programming document for the region of Alsace fulfilling the conditions for Objective 2 pursuant to Article 4(1) and qualifying for transitional support under Objectives 2 and 5(b) pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. As permitted by Article 40(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)(2), the draft includes rural development measures other than those referred to in Article 35(1) of the Regulation. It also includes the information listed in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, in particular a description of the priorities selected and an indication of the financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) and the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section.(5) The date of submission of the draft which was considered acceptable by the Commission constitutes the date from which expenditure under the plan is eligible. Under Article 52(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, as an acceptable plan was submitted between 1 January and 30 April 2000 the date from which expenditure under the plan is eligible is 1 January 2000 in the case of the Structural Funds; in the case of the EAGGF Guarantee Section, Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2603/1999(3) provides that the expenditure is eligible only if it has actually been paid to the beneficiary after the date of submission of the programme. Under Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, it is necessary to lay down the final date for the eligibility of expenditure.(6) The rural development measures to be financed by the EAGGF Guarantee Section are governed, in particular as regards their compatibility and consistency with common agricultural policy measures, by Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999.(7) The single programming document has been drawn up in agreement with the Member State concerned and within the partnership.(8) The Commission has satisfied itself that the single programming document is in accordance with the principle of additionality.(9) Under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Commission and the Member State are required to ensure, in a manner consistent with the principle of partnership, coordination between assistance from the Funds and from the EIB and other existing financial instruments.(10) The EIB has been involved in drawing up the single programming document in accordance with the provisions of Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 and has declared itself prepared to contribute to its implementation in conformity with its statutory provisions.(11) The financial contribution from the Community available over the entire period and its year-by-year breakdown are expressed in euro. The annual breakdown should be consistent with the relevant financial perspective. Under Article 7(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Community contribution has already been indexed at a rate of 2 % per year. Under Article 7(7) and Article 44(2) of the Regulation, the Community contribution may be reviewed at mid-term, and not later than 31 March 2004, to take account of the effective level of inflation and the allocation of the performance reserve.(12) Provision should be made for adapting the financial allocations of the priorities of this single programming document within certain limits to actual requirements reflected by the pattern of implementation on the ground, in agreement with the Member State concerned,. The single programming document for Community structural assistance in the region of Alsace in France eligible under Objective 2 and qualifying for transitional support under Objectives 2 and 5(b) for the period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2006 is hereby approved. 1. In accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the single programming document includes the following elements:(a) the strategy and priorities for the joint action of the Structural Funds and the Member State; their specific quantified targets; the ex-ante evaluation of the expected impact, including on the environmental situation, and the consistency of the priorities with the economic, social and regional policies and the employment strategy of France. The priorities are as follows:1. implementing measures for the whole of the eligible area;2. supporting territorial approaches;3. developing human resources;4. rural development;5. technical assistance;(b) a summary description of the measures planned to implement the priorities, including the information needed to check compliance with the State aid rules under Article 87 of the Treaty;(c) the indicative financing plan specifying for each priority and each year the financial allocation envisaged for the contribution from each Fund and the other financial instruments, including the total amount from the EAGGF Guarantee Section and indicating separately the funding planned for the regions receiving transitional support in respect of Objectives 2 and 5(b) and the total amounts of eligible public or equivalent expenditure and estimated private funding in the Member State. The total contribution from the Funds planned for each year for the single programming document is consistent with the relevant financial perspective;(d) the provisions for implementing the single programming document including designation of the managing authority, a description of the arrangements for managing the single programming document and the use to be made of global grants, a description of the systems for monitoring and evaluation, including the role of the Monitoring Committee and the arrangements for the participation of the partners in that Committee;(e) the ex-ante verification of compliance with additionality and information on the transparency of financial flows.2. The indicative financing plan puts the total cost of the priorities selected for the joint action by the Community and the Member State at EUR 340271767 for the whole period, the financial contribution from the Structural Funds at EUR 93404232 and that from the EAGGF Guarantee Section at EUR 16284000.The resulting requirement for national resources of EUR 115034326 from the public sector and EUR 115549209 from the private sector can be partly met by Community loans from the European Investment Bank and other lending instruments.3. The rate of part-financing by the EAGGF Guarantee Section for each rural development measure is given in the single programming document. The rate of part-financing by the EAGGF at the level of the sub-measure or action is given in the programme complement provided for in Article 19(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 and shall be valid for at least one financial year. 1. The total assistance from the Structural Funds granted under the single programming document amounts to EUR 93404232, to which the EAGGF Guarantee Section will contribute a further EUR 16284000.The procedure for granting the financial assistance, including the financial contribution from the Funds for the various priorities included in the single programming document, is set out in the financing plan annexed to this Decision.2.>TABLE>3. During implementation of the financing plan, the total cost or Community financing of a given priority may be adjusted in agreement with the Member State by up to 25 % of the total Community contribution to the single programming document throughout the programme period, up to a maximum of EUR 30 million, without altering the total Community contribution referred to in paragraph 1. This Decision is without prejudice to the Commission's position on aid schemes falling within Article 87(1) of the Treaty that are included in this assistance and which it has not yet approved. Submission of the application for assistance, the programme complement or a request for payment by the Member State does not replace the notification required by Article 88(3) of the Treaty.Community financing of State aid falling within Article 87(1) of the Treaty, granted under aid schemes or in individual cases, requires prior approval by the Commission under Article 88 of the Treaty, except where the aid falls under the de minimis rule or is exempted under an exemption regulation adopted by the Commission under Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 of 7 May 1998 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 (now 87 and 88) to certain categories of horizontal State aid(4). In the absence of such exemption or approval, aid is illegal and subject to the consequences set out in the procedural regulation for State aid, and its part-financing would be treated as an irregularity within the meaning of Articles 38 and 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999.Consequently, the Commission will not accept requests for interim and final payments under Article 32 of the Regulation for measures being part-financed with new or altered aid, as defined in the procedural regulation for State aid, granted under aid schemes or in individual cases, until such aid has been notified to and formally approved by the Commission.By way of derogation from the preceding paragraphs, Articles 51 and 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall apply in the context of rural development part-financed by the EAGGF. The date from which expenditure shall be eligible is 1 January 2000 for the Structural Funds and 28 April 2000 for the EAGGF Guarantee Section.The closing date for the eligibility of expenditure shall be 31 December 2008. This date is extended to 30 April 2009 for expenditure incurred by bodies granting assistance under Article 9(l) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. The closing date for the eligibility of expenditure in the area receiving transitional support shall be 31 December 2007.The final date for the EAGGF Guarantee Section to take account of payments made by the paying bodies under this programming document shall be 31 December 2006. This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.. Done at Brussels, 22 March 2001.For the CommissionMichel BarnierMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1.(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999 p. 80.(3) OJ L 316, 10.12.1999, p. 26.(4) OJ L 142, 14.5.1998, p. 1.
",Alsace;EU financial instrument;Community financial instrument;European Union financial instrument;European Union's financial instrument;financial instrument of the European Union;development plan;development planning;development programme;development project;financing plan;finance plan;aid system;application for aid;fixing the amount of aid;general aid scheme;request for aid;industrial region;industrial zone;development aid;aid to developing countries;co-development;European Investment Bank;EIB;Structural Funds;reform of the structural funds;regional aid;aid for regional development;aid to less-favoured regions,29
3372,"85/8/EEC: Council Decision of 19 December 1984 on specific Community action to combat poverty. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),Whereas, under Article 2 of the Treaty, the task of the Community is to promote throughout the Community a harmonious development of economic activities, a continuous and balanced expansion, an increase in stability, an accelerated raising of the standard of living and closer relations between the States belonging to it;Whereas the persistence of poverty within the Community is incompatible with this objective;Whereas the uncertainty of employment, a phenomenon which has worsened in recent years, is equally incompatible with this objective;Whereas national economic and social policies and Community action in the field of employment can, by attacking the structural causes of poverty, make an effective contribution to the fight against it;Whereas in addition to anti-poverty measures which may be implemented in connection with the establishment of the various Community policies, more specific Community action is necessary to achieve the objective referred to above;Whereas the Treaty does not provide the specific powers necessary for the adoption of this Decision,. 1. The Commission may implement an anti-poverty programme in order to combat poverty more effectively and carry out positive measures to help the under-privileged and identify the best means of attacking the causes of poverty and alleviating its effects in the Community. To this end, the Commission may:(a) promote or provide financial assistance for various types of action-research measures:- designed to test and develop new methods of helping persons beset by, or threatened with, poverty in the Community,- drawn up and carried out as far as possible with the participation of the persons concerned, and- of particular interest to the Community in that they are addressed to problems common to several Member States;(b) promote or provide financial assistance for the dissemination and exchange of knowledge, the coordination and assessment of anti-poverty measures, and the transfer of innovative approaches between Member States;(c) promote or provide financial assistance for collection and dissemination on a regular basis of comparable data on poverty in the Community.2. For the purposes of this Decision 'the poor' shall be taken to mean persons, families and groups of persons whose resources (material, cultural and social) are so limited as to exclude them from the minimum acceptable way of life in the Member States in which they live. The funds estimated as necessary to implement the measures referred to in Article 1 amount to 25 million ECU for four years (1985 to 1988).Financial support may be granted, in the framework of the appropriations entered annually for this purpose in the general budget of the European Communities, for:(a) action-research projects, up to 50 % of actual expenditure within the limits of assistance requested and approved. However, in exceptional cases, and notably those occurring in particularly underprivileged regions, this limit may be raised to 55 %;(b) other types of activity, if such activities are of exceptional interest for all or part of the Community, in excess of 50 % of actual expenditure within the limits of assistance requested and approved. 1. Applications for Community financial assistance shall be approved and forwarded to the Commission by the Member State or States on whose territory the projects are to be carried out.2. The Commission shall inform the Member States of its decision to grant or refuse the financial assistance requested.3. Both public and private bodies shall be eligible for financial assistance.4. In cases where the Commission takes the initiative for an action-research project or study, it shall obtain the agreement of the Member State or States on whose territory the project is to be carried out. 1. The Commission shall consult the representatives of the Governments of the Member States and, where appropriate, those responsible, within the framework of the projects, for coordination, evaluation and dissemination of knowledge, and independent experts on all matters of importance concerning the implementation of this Decision.2. The Commission shall arrange for the body responsible for each type of action in question to report back to it at regular intervals on the progress or outcome of the action and to convey any other appropriate information. At the end of 1987, the Commission shall submit to the Council and the European Parliament an interim report on the first available results of the various operations carried out with financial assistance from the Community.The Commission shall also submit a final report as soon as possible after the conclusion of the programme. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall take effect on the fifth day following that of its publication.. Done at Brussels, 19 December 1984.For the CouncilThe PresidentP. O'TOOLE(1) OJ No C 208, 8. 8. 1984, p. 10.(2) OJ No C 315, 26. 11. 1984, p. 88.(3) Opinion delivered on 21 and 22 November 1984 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
",non-governmental organisation;NGO;non-governmental international organisation;non-governmental international organization;non-governmental organization;non-governmental regional organisation;non-governmental regional organization;non-governmental world organisation;non-governmental world organization;poverty;economically weak;fight against poverty;new poor;poor;voluntary organisation;charitable organisation;voluntary organization;disclosure of information;information disclosure;balance of payments assistance;BOP assistance;balance of payments facility;balance of payments support;medium-term financial assistance;aid to disadvantaged groups;aid to low-income groups;charity;income support;supplementary benefit,29
12339,"94/375/EC: Council Decision of 6 June 1994 on Community membership of the European Investment Fund. ,Having regard to the Treaty instituting the European Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,Having regard to the proposal by the Commission,Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),Having taken into account the Statutes of the European Investment Fund (2),Whereas the European Council meeting in Edinburgh on 11 and 12 December 1992 invited the Council and the European Investment Bank to give urgent and sympathetic consideration to the establishment as quickly as possible of a European Investment Fund, hereinafter called ‘the Fund’;Whereas the Fund should constitute a cost-effective and efficient means whereby the Community, together with the European Investment Bank and other financial institutions, can provide a significant contribution to the development of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures and to the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);Whereas investments in trans-European networks are essential to the proper functioning of the internal market and whereas, in accordance with procedures provided for in the Statutes of the Fund, some of these investments might involve activities to be implemented in adjacent countries where crossborder projects are involved;Whereas investment support for SMEs is an essential factor in the reinforcement of employment creation;Whereas the Fund will foster investment in both areas, in order to contribute to the pursuit of Community objectives;Whereas speedy implementation of the Fund will stimulate sustained and balanced growth within the Community;Whereas Article 30 of the Statute of the European Investment Bank empowers the Bank's Board of Governors to create the Fund; whereas the Board has decided to create the Fund and to establish its Statutes;Whereas the Community may become a member of the Fund;Whereas appropriate co-ordination will be ensured between the operations of the Fund and Community financial and budgetary instruments;Whereas the Commission will address the Fund's annual report to the European Parliament and the Council, together with any further information which is of particular Community interest;Whereas, in order to meet the objectives of the Fund, it would be appropriate to consider it as a multilateral development bank for the purposes of Council Directive 89/647/EEC (3) and Commission Directive 91/31/EEC (4);Whereas the Treaty does not provide powers for the adoption of this Decision, other than those of Article 235,. The Community, represented by the Commission, shall hereby become a member of the European Investment Fund. The Commission shall keep the Council informed of the work of the bodies of the European Investment Fund. In particular, the Commission shall notify the Council, as soon as it can, of matters to be discussed at the Fund's General Meeting.The Council may, at the request of a Member State or of the Commission, examine those matters.Without prejudice to Article 3, the Commission shall take account of the outcome of that examination when it adopts a position on those matters in the Fund's General Meeting. The position of the Community on a possible increase in the capital of the Fund and on its participation in that increase shall be decided unanimously by the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.. Done at Luxembourg, 6 June 1994.For the CouncilThe PresidentY. PAPANTONIOU(1)  OJ No C 115, 26. 4. 1993, p. 238.(2)  See page 1 of this Official Journal.(3)  Council Directive 89/647/EEC of 18 December 1989 on a solvency ratio for credit institutions (OJ L 386, 30. 12. 1989, p. 14). Directive as amended by Commission Directive 92/30/EEC (OJ L 110, 28. 4. 1992, p. 52).(4)  Commission Directive 91/31/EEC of 19 December 1990 adapting the technical definition of ‘multilateral development banks’ in Council Directive 89/647/EEC on a solvency ratio for credit institutions (OJ L 17, 23. 1. 1991, p. 20).
",investment;capital expenditure;capital investment requirement;shareholding;controlling interest;equity interest;equity investment;equity ownership;equity participation;holding in a company;majority holding;participating interest;small and medium-sized enterprises;EBIC;European Business and Innovation Centre;European Observatory for SMEs;SMEs;SMUs;small and medium-sized businesses;small and medium-sized undertakings;transport network;link road;European Commission;CEC;Commission of the European Communities;EC Commission;EU Commission;development bank;regional development bank,29
30986,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/2005 of 11 October 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1535/2003 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the aid scheme for products processed from fruit and vegetables. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,Whereas:(1) Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 establishes the Community and national processing thresholds and the provisions applicable for calculating the aid amount when a threshold overrun is recorded in a Member State, provided that the Member State in question has a processing threshold for the product concerned as specified in Annex III to that Regulation.(2) The first subparagraph of Article 23(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1535/2003 (2) states that the processed raw material is to count against the processing threshold of the Member State where the producer organisation’s head office is situated.(3) Implementation of this provision in recent marketing years has thrown up anomalies in the aid scheme’s application, notably in the case of tomatoes. Because of this provision, the production of certain producers who are members of a producer organisation which has its head office in another Member State, or the production of producer organisations belonging to an association of producer organisations which has its head office in another Member State counts against the processing threshold of the Member State in which the producer organisation or association of producer organisations has its head office. Experience indicates that this offset should be made against the threshold of the Member State where the raw material is produced.(4) Regulation (EC) No 1535/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Processed Fruit and Vegetables,. Regulation (EC) No 1535/2003 is hereby amended as follows:1. the first subparagraph of Article 23(1) is replaced by the following:2. in the first subparagraph of Article 24, point (b) is replaced by the following:‘(b) the quantity covered by the aid application whereby that quantity, broken down by contract and, if appropriate, by the aid level applicable in the Member State where the raw material is produced, may not exceed the quantity accepted for processing, after deduction of any reduction rates applied;’3. the following subparagraph is added after the first subparagraph of Article 27(1): This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.It shall apply from the 2006/07 marketing year.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 11 October 2005.For the CommissionMariann FISCHER BOELMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2004 (OJ L 64, 2.3.2004, p. 25).(2)  OJ L 218, 30.8.2003, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 180/2005 (OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 7).
",common organisation of markets;CMO;Single CMO;common market organisation;common organization of markets;single common market organisation;fruit product;fruit must;fruit pulp;grape must;jam;marmalade;preserves;vegetable product;pickles;sauerkraut;tomato concentrate;tomato paste;vegetable pulp;aid system;application for aid;fixing the amount of aid;general aid scheme;request for aid;agro-industry;agri-foodstuffs industry;agricultural product processing;agricultural product processing industry;processing of agricultural products,29
19806,"2000/431/EC: Commission Decision of 7 July 2000 amending Decision 1999/766/EC on certain protective measures in respect of infectious salmon anaemia in salmonids in Norway (notified under document number C(2000) 1863) (Text with EEA relevance). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC(2), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries(3), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,Whereas:(1) In July 1999 the Commission adopted Decision 1999/766/EC on certain protective measures in respect of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) in salmonids in Norway(4). The measures include ban on the imports into the Community of live salmon and stringent conditions for the importation of salmon products for human consumption. These measures apply until 1 July 2000.(2) Norway has during spring 2000 reported further outbreaks of ISA. At present, eight different restriction zones regarding ISA, including nine municipalities, are in force.(3) In the light of the disease situation the measures of Decision 1999/766/EC shall be extended until 1 April 2001.(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,. In Article 4 of Decision 1999/766/EC the words ""1 July 2000"" are replaced by ""1 April 2001"". This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 7 July 2000.For the CommissionDavid ByrneMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56.(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1.(3) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.(4) OJ L 302, 25.11.1999, p. 23.
",infectious disease;bacterial disease;cholera;communicable disease;contagious disease;leprosy;malaria;parasitic disease;sleeping sickness;trypanosomiasis;tuberculosis;viral disease;viral diseases;yellow fever;Norway;Kingdom of Norway;fish;piscicultural species;species of fish;import restriction;import ban;limit on imports;suspension of imports;EU Member State;EC country;EU country;European Community country;European Union country;health certificate,29